iDealAdsProfit Engineering Get the audit
■ Amazon PPC · Profit Engineering

More profit from the same ad spend.

Most managers earn a percentage of your ad spend — so they win when you spend more, profit or not. I engineer accounts to a TACOS guardrail: spend grows only while the efficiency holds.

The audit is free — you keep the roadmap either way.
Top Rated Plus · Upwork 100% Job Success 23 tools tested → 1 platform ~$1M/mo ad spend managed 7 yrs on Amazon's algorithms
WHAT IF SPEND HAD A BRAKE? the guardrail goes here front — later. same fuel · more road.
The whole pitch fits on a napkin. The results don't.
01 — the part they leave out

Your manager gets paid when you spend. Not when you profit.

Percentage-of-spend fees mean their income scales with your ad bill — with nothing to stop it. So you get pretty dashboards full of ROAS, clicks, and impressions, while TACOS quietly creeps and the margin disappears.

Most accounts I open are full of campaigns nobody can explain. Working, testing, or just running? When no one can answer that, you're not buying management — you're funding it.

SPEC REVIEW — AS SOLD throttle — wired to their fee brake: not found. their fee your margin time on % of spend → rpm ≠ mileage. nothing in this drawing stops the spend.
Misaligned incentives, drawn to scale
02 — same deal, one difference

My fee can grow with your spend too. The difference is the brake.

A TACOS guardrail written into the engagement: spend grows only while the efficiency holds. If the guardrail breaks, the growth stops — not your margin.

Stop watching the RPM. Start watching the mileage. ROAS and ACOS are engine noise — revs on ad-attributed sales that miss the organic halo, which is exactly where percentage-fee managers hide. TACOS is the odometer. That's why I call myself a Profit Engineer, not a PPC manager: PPC managers optimize campaigns; I optimize the distance you get per dollar.

The guardrail is the whole pitch. Everything else is how it's enforced.
the account — in profile the guardrail — clamps before the margin slips TACOS ≤ TARGET sized to TACOS — not ACOS.
Detail study — the brake.
S. — '26
03 — how the guardrail is enforced

The system: Bank vs Lab.

Every target in your account lives in one of two places — or gets paused. Winners go to the Bank as protected assets I scale cautiously. Unproven terms go to the Lab with one rule: no sale in 7 days — dead, no exceptions. Everything else is a Liability quietly draining margin, and I pause it.

Account Morphology Study // Project: Guardrail

SCALE N.T.S. · REV 07·26 · SHT 1/2
THE LAB 7-day rule · winners graduate THE BANK protected assets — where margin lives proves it converts → graduates bank profits fund the lab — a closed loop liabilities → DNF. paused, week one the 7-day clock — sec A·A the bank = the fuel cell. it rides amidships — sec A·A.
The Bank

Proven winners, held as protected assets. Scaled cautiously — never gambled. This is where your margin lives.

The Lab

Controlled experiments funded by Bank profits. One rule: no sale in 7 days — dead, no exceptions. Winners graduate.

Liabilities

Campaigns nobody can explain — not working, not testing, just spending. Paused. Bank vs Lab makes an account explainable inside the first week.

■ 04 · The telemetry

Spend doubled. Revenue doubled. TACOS held.

Season comparison // Revenue vs ad spendTELEMETRY · IDA
$5.4M $509K SEASON 2024 TACOS 9% — HELD $9.8M $991K SEASON 2025 TACOS 10% — HELD
Revenue Ad spend (hatched)
+$0.0M
new revenue — bought with one point of TACOS
AD SPEND$509K → $991K×1.9
REVENUE$5.4M → $9.8M×1.8
TACOS9% → 10%HELD

Spend was allowed to nearly double for one reason: the revenue kept earning it. Efficiency holds → growth gets the green light. Efficiency slips → spend stops. That's the whole deal.

I'm paid to capture territory profitably, not to inflate your ad bill.

10%10% Market share · 4 months

A kitchen brand held 10% share against competitors with unlimited budgets. I targeted 10,000+ longtails the big players ignored, then used those profits to fund pushes on the head terms. Capital efficiency beats brute force.

~$1M/mo ad spend under management 7 yrs dissecting Amazon's algorithms 100% Job Success · Top Rated Plus — Upwork

You've just read my telemetry. Let me read yours.

send your top 3 ASINs — I'll start with the outside overview.
05 — one pair of hands

I'm not an agency.
That's the offer.

The agency model: the senior closer sells you, then a junior with thirty accounts runs you. Reports show the curated subset — the dashboard smiles while the P&L doesn't.

The profit engineer: the person who audits you is the person who runs youstart to finish. You read the same telemetry I do, reconciled to what lands in your bank account. There's no handoff, because there's no one to hand off to.

intake capped at 3 new accounts / mo — I'm the one doing the work.
no hourly · fee sized to your account, in writing after the audit — it grows only when your revenue does.
DNF the agency: handoff → handoff → ? the engineer: start finish. intake — 3 / mo. capped.
one line. one hand.
S. — '26
06 — who this is for

Built for brands doing $1M+ a year on Amazon.

Entry Scrutineering // Project: Guardrail

REV 07·26 · SHT 2/2

This is for you if CLEARED

  • You're doing $1M+ a year on Amazon and ads are a real line item on your P&L.
  • You've been burned by at least one agency — and can name the month it went sideways.
  • You want profit governed, not spend managed.

Not for you if DNS

  • You're launching your first product on a $2K budget — there's nothing to engineer yet. Come back at scale.
  • You're shopping for the cheapest pair of hands. I'm deliberately not that — cheap PPC management is how accounts end up on my audit table.
  • You want to micromanage the manager.
  • You don't care about top line and operational profit.
  • You judge success by ACOS alone.
  • You want instant results by tomorrow morning.
  • The business is your side hustle.
  • You want one person to run Amazon ads, store design and catalog management — those are three different skill sets.
07 — your move

The audit is free — for a selfish reason.

Every engagement ends up in my portfolio, so I choose who I work with — and the audit is how I choose. I only say yes when the win is visible on your real data. Can’t help you? I’ll tell you straight, and the audit stays with you as your roadmap. Good fit? Same document — now it’s our roadmap.

01

Send your top 2–3 ASINs

…and which marketplaces they're in — US / CA / UK. I'll do an outside overview first.

02

If I like what I see — the full audit

I do a full audit of the account — free.

03

Then we get on a call and talk numbers

What I found, what I can help with, and how. That way we spend the call on your numbers instead of introductions.

I take three clients per month. Fit over volume — if the math doesn't work for your category, I'll tell you straight. No pitch, just why.

The fastest way to see if I can help is to let me look.

the door — your top 3 ASINs and where they sell

that's the whole door — a few ASINs and where they sell